Apart from indulging most of my free time into endless reading (currently reading Thud! by Sir Terry Pratchett) and not exactly being inundated with postgraduate project work at this point, I've been reading up on some historical essays regarding the internal political disorders of Iceland in medieval times. One period I've found particularly striking revolves around the Sturlunga Sagas. This was a period of internal strife during the 13th century; the time of King Haakon IV of Norway (otherwise known as Haakon the Old, due to the long period of his reign). It was widely considered as one of most violent and radical times of Iceland's history.
This paper by Jesse L. Byock, however, suggests that the period of change might be exaggerated and calls into question our understanding of Einar Ólafur Sveinsson's influential study into these years. Basically, it could have been a lot worse for Iceland back then, according to Jesse.
However, it's likely that I'll be making a violent fantasy version of these events in my first story, based in my own fictitious world (ever a work in progress). From what I gather with the Age of the Sturlungs, it was ultimately a time of shifting change, and the best thing to do was to submit. But these changes, even though they weren't as bloody as initially perpetuated, weren't easy.
However, it's likely that I'll be making a violent fantasy version of these events in my first story, based in my own fictitious world (ever a work in progress). From what I gather with the Age of the Sturlungs, it was ultimately a time of shifting change, and the best thing to do was to submit. But these changes, even though they weren't as bloody as initially perpetuated, weren't easy.